Start with the questions buyers ask
AI search is not one shared directory. Google’s AI Overviews and AI Mode can show supporting links from indexed web pages. ChatGPT and Claude can retrieve public web content when their search features are available. The products use different systems, and access alone does not guarantee a mention or citation.
That makes useful, specific answers a practical starting point. Think about the conversations before someone becomes a customer. What do they need? Are you the right kind of business? What happens first? What could make the work unsuitable? Publishing more articles simply to mention AI does not answer those questions.
Choose three to five questions from real sales conversations, without customer names or private details. Include one about service fit, one about the process and one about an important constraint. Choose the page that should answer each question. If the answer changes by location or project type, explain the difference.
For an engineering consultancy, a useful question might be: “What does a structural feasibility assessment include?” A good page could explain the deliverables, required plans, exclusions and when detailed design becomes a separate scope. This is an illustrative business example, not measured search demand or a claim about AI results.
Give a clear answer and a reason to trust it
Put the short answer near the top of the relevant page. Then explain who the service suits, what is included, what affects the next step and how to enquire. Use the language a buyer would use. A page should help someone make progress even if they never speak to you.
Support important claims with something a reader can inspect: an approved project example, named qualification, process explanation or published source. Say what your business actually did. In the feasibility example, a project showing the assessment scope supports a claim about your experience; it does not automatically support a claim about faster approvals.
Keep business names, service areas and contact information consistent. Review old pages when the offer changes. The service-page guide helps turn a buyer question into a useful page, and the case-study guide helps select credible proof.
Make your answers available to search
The route starts with a public page a search service can reach, then a useful answer it may choose to draw on, then an answer or supporting link a buyer may see. These are separate stages. Improving the page helps you control the information you publish; it does not control what an AI product selects or what the buyer does afterwards.
Ask your website partner to check your priority pages and explain any confirmed access restriction. Search access and model-training permission are separate decisions. Google does not require a special AI file or special schema for AI Overviews or AI Mode. Use the readiness checklist for provider-specific checks and the evidence to request, while keeping intentional preview and private-page restrictions in place.
One page. Different search products.
Buyers may ask the same question in different products. Each may retrieve or use different public sources.
What does a structural feasibility assessment include?
- Deliverables and exclusions
- Information the client needs to supply
- Relevant, approved project evidence
Illustrative page content

Google Search
AI Overviews & AI Mode
Page indexed and eligible for a snippet.
ChatGPT search
Search access and relevant public answers.

Claude web search
Search and user-retrieval controls.
Possible source use, not a guaranteed mention or citation. Provider controls differ; use the readiness checklist to brief the checks.
Check what AI says about your business
Once a month, ask the same few buyer questions in the products your audience might use. Keep the wording, location, language and search mode as consistent as possible. Start a fresh conversation. Save the date, product, question, answer and linked sources so you can compare the next check.
Look for three things: whether the answer is accurate, whether your business is mentioned, and whether a link points to one of your pages. These are separate findings. Open the links and check whether they support the answer. If a product cannot search, record that rather than treating it as a missing citation.
Worked example: separate accuracy, mentions and links
Illustrative only: imagine checking “What does a structural feasibility assessment include?” for a fictional consultancy whose published page describes an assessment but makes no approval-time promise. These are possible answer patterns, not saved results from a real product or business.
Scroll across to see every column if needed
| Possible answer | What to record |
|---|---|
| Explains the assessment accurately, without naming the consultancy. | Accuracy: supported by the reviewed information. Mention: absent. Own-page link: absent. This is not evidence of an access fault. |
| Names the consultancy and claims it guarantees faster approvals, linking to its scope page. | Accuracy: unsupported timing claim. Mention: present. Own-page link: present, but it does not support the claim. A citation has not made the answer reliable. |
| Names the consultancy, describes the published scope and links to the relevant service page. | Accuracy: consistent with the reviewed scope. Mention: present. Own-page link: relevant and supporting. No visit or enquiry has been established. |
For a real check, add the actual date, product, search mode, full question and saved answer to each entry. Keep the cited URL and your reason for judging the claim supported, incorrect or unknown. Never fill missing runs or sources with plausible examples.
A single missing mention is not a diagnosis. Answers can vary without a website change, and a citation does not prove a buyer visited or enquired. There is no universal AI score here. Use the check to spot factual problems and helpful content gaps, not to promise a share of all AI searches.
Read three signals separately
A named business and a source link do not, by themselves, make an answer accurate.
- Accuracy
- Does the answer match the facts?
Record supported, incorrect or unknown.
- Business mention
- Is your business actually named?
Record present or absent, separately from accuracy.
- Supporting link
- Does the linked page support the claim?
Open it. A link can be missing, irrelevant or unsupported.
These are independent checks, not a combined AI visibility score.
Choose one useful improvement
Prioritise a confirmed access problem first, then missing or misleading answers, then stronger supporting evidence. If the pages already help buyers and no defect is confirmed, keep the monthly check small. Adding dozens of similar pages is not a substitute for improving the answer that matters.
Give the next task an owner and a review date. After it is published, check the actual page and return to the same buyer questions. Keep any identifiable visits and qualified enquiries separate from AI mentions. Use existing authorised reporting; leave missing attribution unknown. The aim is a more useful, trustworthy website and better business decisions.
Put it to work.
Copy a prompt into Claude or ChatGPT, replace the bracketed details and review the result with your team.
Use public information. Leave out personal or confidential details. This page copies text only; it does not send anything to an AI service.
Find the answers your buyers need
Use this in Claude or ChatGPT with your public website and priority service.
Read the prompt or copy it manually
Review a monthly AI answer check
Paste public answers and links you have saved; the prompt does not run a hidden audit.
